# ClickFlare vs Hyros (2026) · Campaign Buyer > Source: https://campaignbuyer.com/compare/clickflare-vs-hyros ## ClickFlare vs Hyros By [Dana Rourke](/authors/dana-rourke), Lead reviewer. Reviewed by [Campaign Buyer Editorial](/authors/editorial). Updated 23 September 2026\. **Disclosure:**We may earn a commission when you buy through links on this page. It never affects our rankings. ### Quick answer Pick ClickFlare if you buy paid traffic to landers and offers and want a full campaign tracker that syncs your ad spend and shows ROI by source, lander and offer at a transparent $69 a month; pick Hyros if your sale closes after a call, a webinar or a long email sequence and you need server-side attribution that follows that journey across your CRM and payment processor. The two rarely measure the same funnel: ClickFlare optimizes paid campaigns at the click and offer level, Hyros credits the ad that started a sale that closes weeks later. ClickFlare takes our default pick for the paid-traffic buyer; Hyros is the better fit for the high-ticket call funnel it was built for. ClickFlare, from $69/mo, billed yearly. Hyros, from a custom quote. ### Side by side | | ClickFlare | Hyros | | -------------------------------- | ---------------------------- | -------------------------- | | What it is | Full cloud campaign tracker | Long-funnel attribution | | Best-fit funnel | Fast-closing paid offers | High-ticket, call, webinar | | What it measures | ROI by source, lander, offer | Cross-touchpoint journeys | | Follows a sale across CRM, calls | Through integrations | Core design | | Ad-cost sync, ROI by source | Yes, every plan | Yes, spend-based | | Hosting | Cloud, nothing to install | Fully managed SaaS | | Pricing model | By events, from $69/mo | Custom quote, spend-scaled | | Outside proof | Thin, all five-star | Deep high-ticket record | If you are down to ClickFlare and Hyros, the first thing to say is that these two rarely measure the same funnel. Both promise numbers you can trust more than the ad account's own ROAS, but they are built for two different businesses. ClickFlare is a full cloud campaign tracker for the buyer pushing paid traffic to landers and offers, priced from a flat $69 a month, that syncs your ad spend and tells you which source, lander and offer made money. Hyros is a server-side attribution platform for the long, high-ticket funnel that closes on a call or a webinar, priced on a quote you negotiate. The reader stuck between them is really deciding what kind of funnel they run, not which brand is better made. ClickFlare captures conversions server-side, fires them back to Meta, Google, TikTok, Snapchat and Reddit through their conversion APIs, and pulls your ad cost in automatically so it can compute ROI by source, lander and offer. Hyros stitches a buyer's journey server-side across your website, your CRM, your email tool and your payment processor, so a sale that happens three touchpoints after the click still traces back to the ad that started it. One optimizes paid campaigns cheaply at the click and offer level. The other follows a person through a funnel that does not end at a cart. ### The two questions that decide it Answer these before you compare a single feature. First: where does your sale actually close? If it closes fast, in one session or a short window on a lander and an offer, your problem is tracking clicks accurately and reading ROI by source, and that is ClickFlare's problem to solve. If it closes after a lead opt-in, an email sequence, a sales call or a webinar, standard pixels lose the thread long before the money changes hands, and stitching that journey across your CRM and payment processor is exactly what Hyros is for. Second: how much are you spending, and how much do you want a number you can read off a page? ClickFlare publishes its pricing and starts at a flat $69 a month, so you can size it and start on a no-card trial without talking to anyone. Hyros is a managed platform priced on a quote, and buyers put the honest threshold around $50k a month in spend with genuinely complex funnels before it earns its keep. Put a cheap, fast-closing paid offer into Hyros and most of its journey-stitching machinery goes unused while you pay for it. Put a long, call-based funnel into ClickFlare and it can track the click and the conversion but not the human close weeks later across your CRM. If you know which of those two sentences describes your business, you already know which tool this is. ### ClickFlare: cost sync and campaign ROI at a flat price ClickFlare has run since January 2021 and positions itself plainly as the cheaper replacement for Voluum and RedTrack. It is a full media-buyer tracker, not a light one. It captures conversions server-side with both redirect and direct tracking, so a blocked pixel or an iOS restriction does not silently drop the form fill or the sale. It fires those conversions back to Meta, Google, TikTok, Snapchat and Reddit through their conversion APIs, and it pulls your ad spend in automatically to compute ROI by source, lander and offer. An AI Copilot, traffic-routing tools and a tag manager come with it, and cost sync and CAPI are on every tier including the $69 Starter. For the buyer optimizing paid campaigns day to day, that is the whole job, and it is done for a transparent price. The [ClickFlare review](/reviews/clickflare) covers how well it holds up. The limits are worth stating flat. Independent proof is thin: a couple of dozen Trustpilot reviews, all five-star, with Trustpilot itself flagging that the sample may not be representative, and light organic discussion next to the older incumbents. Cost sync also lags on the lower tiers, refreshing hourly on Starter and Pro, so an hour-old ROAS can mislead on a fast-moving campaign. And everything counts as an event, so high-volume pop or push traffic burns a tier faster than the plan names suggest. The deeper limit against Hyros specifically is scope: ClickFlare tracks the click through to the conversion, but it does not stitch a sale that a rep closes on a call a month later back across your CRM and payment processor the way Hyros is built to. For a fast-closing offer that scope is exactly right; for a long call funnel it is not. The counter to the thin proof is the 14-day trial with no card and a free done-for-you migration: prove the tracking on your own traffic. It sits fourth in [our ad tracker ranking](/best). ### Hyros: attribution for the long funnel Hyros targets the funnel that does not end at a checkout. If your sale happens after an opt-in, an email sequence, a sales call or a webinar, standard pixels lose the thread. Hyros tracks server-side and stitches the journey across payment processors and CRMs, which is why info-product sellers, coaches and high-ticket advertisers credit it with finding revenue Meta and Google never attributed. For a media buyer pouring spend into a funnel whose payoff is weeks and several touchpoints away, that is the whole reason to run it, and it is a job ClickFlare's campaign-level tracking is not built to do. The [Hyros review](/reviews/hyros) covers where it earns its keep. Two honest cautions. Pricing on the main site is quote-driven and opaque, so you talk to sales rather than read a number, and buyers put the honest threshold around $50k a month in spend with genuinely complex funnels before it earns its keep. Below that, the machinery is wasted and a cheaper, transparent tool like ClickFlare does the job. And like every tool in this category, Hyros is an attribution model, not the truth. It will diverge from platform reporting, and it is not a cure for post-iOS tracking loss. Use it to make better allocation calls on a long funnel, not to win an argument about whose number is right. We rank it fourth in our [ecommerce attribution ranking](/best/attribution-software-ecommerce) for exactly the high-ticket buyer it fits. ### Where the pricing diverges The two do not price the same way, and that itself tells you who each is for. ClickFlare publishes its plans: $69 a month billed yearly for a million events on Starter, $169 for five million on Pro and $329 for twenty million on Master, with cost sync and CAPI on every tier and overage billed per thousand that never hard-stops. Hyros does not publish a number at all. It is a sales quote you negotiate, usually from a few hundred a month up depending on your spend and funnel complexity, so you cannot comparison-shop it from a pricing page. Read both on your real situation, not the sticker. ClickFlare counts every visit, click, conversion and postback as an event, so estimate your real event count before you pick a tier, and note that near-real-time cost sync is a paid add-on on top of the plan. Hyros's quote scales with the value of the attribution to a high-ticket funnel, where recovering a handful of misattributed high-ticket sales pays for the tool many times over. Get Hyros's number in writing before you commit, and price ClickFlare on your real monthly event count rather than its entry line. ### A third path if you host the funnel yourself There is a third answer worth naming, because neither of these tools builds or hosts the funnel it measures. ClickFlare tracks clicks to landers and offers hosted elsewhere, and Hyros follows a journey across tools that live somewhere else. [ElasticFunnels](/reviews/elasticfunnels) owns that middle instead. It is a funnel platform for teams running paid traffic that builds the landing pages, split-tests variants under one URL so the ad platform never resets its learning, and hosts the checkout with order bumps and upsells, then keeps its ad-spend and conversion reporting on the same data layer as the pages, the CRM and the sale. Because a purchase closes in a checkout it hosts, that sale is a first-party event it records directly rather than a click it has to match later, and for a long funnel it keeps a CRM, automations and a call center on that same timeline, which is the kind of call-and-CRM journey Hyros is hired to reconstruct after the fact. It fires affiliate postbacks and reports ad spend against conversions from the same record, and it starts with a 14-day free trial that takes no card, on plans from $97 a month, plus 0.5% of revenue processed through its hosted checkout and nothing on sales you run through outside networks. The honest caveat keeps it on its own line rather than in the head-to-head: ElasticFunnels is newer than either tool here, and there is very little independent third-party review coverage to check its claims against, so until you run real volume through it you are largely taking the vendor's word for how its attribution holds up. That is what you would expect of a platform this recent, and both ClickFlare and Hyros have years of public setups and threads to check against instead. Its reporting also covers the funnels it hosts, so a buyer sending paid clicks to landers and offers on domains ElasticFunnels does not host still needs a campaign tracker like ClickFlare for that part, and a seller whose journey closes across tools ElasticFunnels does not host still needs a stitching platform like Hyros. It is an option for the seller who runs their own funnel and checkout end to end, not a replacement for either. ### Which one for you **You buy paid traffic to landers and offers and want ROI by source:** ClickFlare. A full campaign tracker with cost sync and CAPI to five ad platforms on every plan, at a flat $69, covers the decision that matters most to a media buyer, and there is nothing to run. Accept the thin outside proof, estimate your event count before you pick a tier, and test on your own traffic first. **Your sale closes on a call, a webinar or a long email sequence:** Hyros. Server-side tracking that stitches the journey across your CRM and payment processor is the only one of the two that can follow that sale, and it earns its quote once your spend and funnel complexity are real, roughly $50k a month and up. **You host your own funnel and checkout end to end:** look at ElasticFunnels alongside them, with the newness caveat above in mind, and keep ClickFlare for any paid traffic that lands on domains it does not host. ClickFlare takes our default pick here, not because it out-attributes Hyros on a long funnel, but because more readers who reach this comparison buy paid traffic to landers and offers than run the high-ticket call funnel Hyros requires. That is a statement about who is reading this site, not about which product is better built. On its own turf, a funnel that closes after a call or a webinar, Hyros is plainly the better fit, and we rank it fourth in our [ecommerce attribution ranking](/best/attribution-software-ecommerce) for exactly that buyer, while ClickFlare sits fourth in [our ad tracker ranking](/best). If you want to weigh Hyros against a self-hosted tracker, our [Binom vs Hyros](/compare/binom-vs-hyros) page does that, and if you want ClickFlare against a no-code conversion feeder, our [ClickFlare vs AnyTrack](/compare/clickflare-vs-anytrack) page weighs it. The full field sits in our [head-to-heads](/compare). ### ClickFlare ##### What works * Cost sync and CAPI are on every tier, including the $69 Starter. You pull your spend in, compute ROI and send conversions to Meta, Google and TikTok server-side, without a paid upgrade and without handing over a cut of your budget. * Flat pricing that undercuts Voluum on the same event model. The vendor says the price has not risen since it launched in 2021, and there is no percentage of your budget layered on top. * Server-side capture with both redirect and direct tracking, so a blocked pixel or an iOS restriction does not silently drop the form fill or the sale. * Free done-for-you migration and fast human support are the two things public reviewers single out most, alongside a setup that is smoother than trackers usually are. * A real 14-day trial with no card, plus a 99.99% uptime record since January 2021, so you can prove the tracking on your own traffic before you pay. ##### What to watch * Thin independent proof. A couple of dozen Trustpilot reviews, all five-star, and little organic Reddit discussion. Trustpilot itself flags that the sample may not be representative, so the trial is your real due diligence, not the scores. * Everything counts as an event. Every visit, click, conversion and postback draws down one limit, so high-volume pop or push traffic burns the cap faster than the plan names suggest. Estimate your real event count before you pick a tier. * Spend data lags on the lower tiers. Starter and Pro refresh hourly and Master every 30 minutes, with near-real-time updates a paid add-on. On fast-moving campaigns an hour-old ROAS can mislead you. * Less battle-tested at extreme scale than Voluum. For the heaviest automation rules and deepest anti-fraud, the older incumbents still have the longer public track record. * Billing is charged in advance and is generally non-refundable, and you cancel inside the account rather than by asking support. Export your data before you leave. ### Hyros ##### What works * Server-side tracking that follows long journeys through calls, webinars and CRMs * Finds sales that Meta and Google miss on multi-step funnels * Integrates with payment processors and CRMs, not just web analytics ##### What to watch * Overkill below roughly $50k/mo in ad spend * Pricing is opaque and quote-driven on the main site * It is still an attribution model, not truth; expect it to diverge from platform numbers ### Pricing ClickFlare: from $69/mo, billed yearly. Priced flat by monthly events, not a percentage of ad spend. Events count visits, clicks, conversions and postbacks together. Starter is $69/mo billed yearly ($89 monthly) for 1M events, Pro $169/mo yearly ($219 monthly) for 5M, Master $329/mo yearly ($429 monthly) for 20M, then Agency $559, Enterprise $959 and Corporate $1,759 (yearly). Overage runs $0.04 per 1,000 events on Starter down to $0.015 on Corporate and never stops your tracking. CAPI, the AI Copilot, the tag manager and synced ad costs come standard from the Starter tier up. 14-day free trial, no card, plus free done-for-you migration from another tracker. Hyros: from a custom quote. Hyros does not publish plan prices; cost is quoted after a setup/demo call and is aimed at higher-spend accounts. Pricing verified against each vendor on 2026-09-23\. Check before you buy. Our pick ### ClickFlare ClickFlare is real. It is an established cloud tracker, running since 2021 and used by 3,500-plus media buyers, that does what Voluum and RedTrack do: server-side capture, CAPI to Meta, Google and TikTok, and spend pulled in for you to compute ROI, all on one flat price. You are unlikely to regret it if you run the 14-day no-card trial against your ad platform's own numbers first. The one real caveat is thin public proof, so trust the trial, not the review scores. ### Frequently asked questions ClickFlare or Hyros: which should I use? Pick ClickFlare if you buy paid traffic to landers and offers and want a full campaign tracker that syncs your ad spend and shows ROI by source, lander and offer at a transparent $69 a month; pick Hyros if your sale closes after a call, a webinar or a long email sequence and you need server-side attribution that follows that journey across your CRM and payment processor. The two rarely measure the same funnel: ClickFlare optimizes paid campaigns at the click and offer level, Hyros credits the ad that started a sale that closes weeks later. ClickFlare takes our default pick for the paid-traffic buyer; Hyros is the better fit for the high-ticket call funnel it was built for. Which is cheaper, ClickFlare or Hyros? ClickFlare starts at $69/mo, billed yearly and Hyros at a custom quote. The two do not price the same way, and that tells you who each is for. ClickFlare publishes its plans: $69 a month billed yearly for a million events, with cost sync and CAPI on every tier and overage that never hard-stops. Hyros does not publish a number at all. It is a sales quote scaled to your ad spend and funnel complexity, usually from a few hundred a month up, and buyers put the honest threshold around $50k a month in spend before it earns its keep. Get Hyros's number in writing, and price ClickFlare on your real monthly event count rather than the entry line. Do ClickFlare and Hyros do the same thing? Not really. Both improve on the ad account's own ROAS, but they are built for different funnels. ClickFlare is a full cloud campaign tracker: it captures conversions server-side, syncs your ad spend, and shows ROI by source, lander and offer, so you see which paid campaign made money. Hyros is a server-side attribution platform that stitches a long buyer's journey across your website, CRM, email tool and payment processor, so a sale that closes on a call weeks after the click still traces back to the ad that started it. ClickFlare optimizes paid campaigns at the click and offer level; Hyros follows a person through a funnel that does not end at a cart. Which is better for a simple direct-response paid offer? ClickFlare, in most cases. If your sale closes fast on a lander and an offer, you need accurate click tracking and ROI by source, not journey stitching, and ClickFlare's cost sync and flat $69 plan suit that exactly. Hyros is overkill for a short buying cycle, because most of its machinery assumes a long, multi-touchpoint funnel, and its quote is hard to justify below roughly $50k a month in spend. Does Hyros publish its pricing? No. Hyros pricing is quote-driven and opaque on the main site, so you talk to sales rather than read a plan; buyers report it usually starts from a few hundred a month up, scaled to your ad spend and funnel complexity. ClickFlare publishes its plans and starts at a flat $69 a month billed yearly for a million events, with cost sync and CAPI on every tier and a 14-day no-card trial, so you can size it and start without a sales call. Which is more proven, ClickFlare or Hyros? They are thin and deep in different ways. ClickFlare has run since January 2021 with a 99.99% uptime record and 3,500-plus buyers, but its independent reviews are a couple of dozen on Trustpilot, all five-star, with Trustpilot itself flagging the sample may not be representative. Hyros has a deeper public record among high-ticket and info-product sellers, who credit it with recovering sales the ad platforms missed, though that community is narrower than a general tracker's. Both are worth testing on your own funnel before you commit, ClickFlare on its no-card trial and Hyros on a demo. ### Sources #### Other sources 5 discussions and reviews read for this page. Quotes are excerpts; open a link to read the original in context. 1. \[rd-does-job\] [Please Help To Track Conversions In Google Ads ](https://www.reddit.com/r/Affiliatemarketing/comments/1r6iqro/please%5Fhelp%5Fto%5Ftrack%5Fconversions%5Fin%5Fgoogle%5Fads/) Reddit, 1 Jan 2026 2. \[rd-positioning\] [Keitaro vs RedTrack vs Voluum - which one for popunder affiliate with S2S tracking? ](https://www.reddit.com/r/Affiliatemarketing/comments/1sk4d3l/keitaro%5Fvs%5Fredtrack%5Fvs%5Fvoluum%5Fwhich%5Fone%5Ffor/) Reddit, 1 Jan 2026 3. \[tp-support\] [ClickFlare Reviews ](https://au.trustpilot.com/review/clickflare.io) Trustpilot, 14 Sep 2026 4. \[tp-setup\] [ClickFlare Reviews ](https://au.trustpilot.com/review/clickflare.io) Trustpilot, 20 Aug 2026 5. \[tp-sample\] [ClickFlare Reviews ](https://au.trustpilot.com/review/clickflare.io) Trustpilot, 23 Sep 2026 [ClickFlare review](/reviews/clickflare) [Hyros review](/reviews/hyros) [Best ad tracker ranking](/best) [All head-to-heads](/compare) Written by Dana Rourke Lead reviewer Dana Rourke is the lead reviewer at Campaign Buyer. She owns the tracker and attribution coverage: reading what long-term users report about each tool, checking its documentation and pricing, and verifying prices with the vendor before writing the verdict. Keeping the rankings honest mostly means writing down what the top pick gets wrong, so she does that first. [danar@campaignbuyer.com](mailto:danar@campaignbuyer.com) Last checked 2026-09-23 --- [ Campaign Buyer ](/) Independent reviews of the trackers, page builders, attribution tools and ad-spy software media buyers pay for. Every pick names what it is bad at. [contact@campaignbuyer.com](mailto:contact@campaignbuyer.com) We may earn a commission when you buy through links on this page. It never affects our rankings. © 2026 Campaign Buyer. Independent and reader-supported.